this introduction is full of wrongly written words and sentences due to cyber attacks on my devices while I am working. However, I was happy when I managed to publish it at all. Then I had been too busy until now to make some correction. So please excuse the many mistakes in the register introduction. The essential pdf.files can be read better.
In this register you find my various legal work in my own but general public interest too
Also in the interest of my deceived wife I filed a constitutional complaint about the unlegal social court procedure in which she claimed hyperthermic treatments which were refused illegally and much too late after six (first instance) and ten months (second and last instance) in summary proceedings! Compare if the claimant is the Bahn and subject a workers strike the court decides the case on the same or the next day at the latest. However, last time against the claimant Bahn but at least right in time. Every day costs a lot of money whereas in the social medical treatment case every day only leads closer to the end of an expensive life of an insurance holder...
The first file below is my criminal action agsinst my mother who took care for me being admitted to LKH Bonn in 1990 rather than to Mehrheim what would have been the competent district hospital. In Bonn the psychiatrist of the AA (foreign secretary) which had not yet moved to Berlin treated me then three weeks too long and filled me up with the neuroleptic NEUROCIL which closed my brain synapses again which had just opened in course of growing adult and started to send my beautiful thougts around my nearer and farther environment.
The second file is the criminal action which I filed 2018 with the po (prosecutor office) against my brother who terrorises me since my synapses reopend 22 years later, i. e., with 22 years of delay and which build - when they are open - the basis for the collective multiplication of the terrorism. Concretely I complained against the police order to leave the house of my father in which I had my place of living without counterchecked reasons which were lies (the more than eager police man did neither ask me nor my father what had happened hence for our version but acted straight away aftet my brother had instructed him infront of my eyes. The police was sent to the house by vice president judge Simone Kreß who jad called them and told them on the telefone obviously already how many real big muscles decorate my body and how terribly dangerous I therfore are) as well as without any prewarning. m this day anwards I made my first experiences as proud homeless man who deepened them since and developed many useful tricks and ways to enjoy light life if only my backpack and my hand bag in which I carry my isomatrass and sleeping bag were not as heayy as they unavoidably are.
The young po had sent the file against my mother back to me trying to reject it too early in the grounds of limitation of time. When I sent it together with the second part back again explaining that I had neither known my body violation nor a chance to know it before the synapsis reopened again in 2012 since I had been told that I had a psychosis which was treated succesefully in the hospital. The po understood, filed both actions together under the same file no. and open it again until today only when I sent two more addups to add them to it. That the action is more than well reasond follows from the fact that nither the young po nor her boss not even one time tried to refuse the action on legal grounds again what they would have loved in order to get their desk clean of this peace of work and what they had shown just before I wanted to send the secomd part of my action against the criminal offenses committed from twenty two years later onwards until today.
The thitd file is the first addup to the case in April 2018. The other two addups remain stolen.
The fourth file is the constitutional complaint of my wife against the social court summary proceedings in which the judges refused the claimed hyperthermic treatments on inhuman wrong grounds after six months in the first instance and after another four, hence, ten minths together in the second instance exactly three days after my wife had died meanwhile. In the first instsnce the judge argued that she deid not suffer from a disease against which no standard therapies exist since she suffered from ovarian cancer against which a multitude of different chemotherapies existed so that even when the selected one did not have effective healing working the claimant could change the therapy to try the next one until she would find one that worked what the claimant in the case had done too after the fifth cycle and had changed to another substances. This was somewhat cynical. The therapy did not work at all and my wife stopped not changed the therapy an order to get another surgery. Only after the surgery could not be done succesefully any more due to the too fast growth of the cancer gauze and the surgeon had taken a piece of the infected gauze and sent to a laboratory that tested 14 different substances in the chemical glass of which three worked slightly and two showed strong working indictions whereas nine substances did mot work at all my wife had picked one of the two strongly working substances and was donated on other maybe two months of life until she went straight in her final direction. That this test had cost , 2.000 Euro itself was not mentioned by the judge of course. Can you believe it. Then you might also believe how the seconed instance even topped this cynical masterpiece of justicia. The social Land court first generously admitted that the first instance decision was wrong and that the treatments must have granted in the fist instance. However, now four months later the judges had asked if Pat still received the claimed hyperthermic treatments what I had responded to that she was just flying to Munich in order to get there a special regional chemotherapy treatment which might last four to six weeks and that ww would not know yet if further treatments were going to become necessary thereafter. Pat flew to Munich on the first of October and died after an emergency surgery of a column congestion that she had developed before and on the flight already and that was terribly painful when she had arrived in the clinic where she was given pain killers and was surged the next morning. After she had begun to recover well from it in the beginning of the days who followed on the morning of the third day her organs refused service collectively and she died on the evening of the 15. October 2015.
When I opened the next letter from the social land court five days later it dated the 18 October 2011. The judges had decided three days after Pat had died that the claimant could not be granted the treatments in the course of the current summary proceedings because the herefor legally necessary urgency of the facts to decide had vanished meanwhile because the husband of the claimant had declared that she was not receiving these treatments momentarily due to the planned treatment in Munich and that it wouldnt be clear yet how the claimant was to proceed after the four weeks in Munich would have terminated. I save you and me from offering more words on it.